International

[ International ] [ Main Menu ]


  


53484


Date: March 25, 2024 at 04:08:47
From: akira, [DNS_Address]
Subject: How Western Media Language Misrepresents Palestinians, Shields Israel

URL: https://www.palestinechronicle.com/fake-neutrality-how-western-media-language-misrepresents-palestinians-shields-israel/


August 24, 2022

Fake Neutrality: How Western Media Language Misrepresents Palestinians,
Shields Israel
By Ramzy Baroud

"While US and western mainstream and corporate media remain biased in
favor of Israel, they often behave as if they are a third, neutral party. This is
simply not the case.

Take the New York Times coverage of the latest Israeli war on Gaza as an
example. Its article on August 6, “Israel-Gaza Fighting Flares for a Second
Day” is the typical mainstream western reporting on Israel and Palestine, but
with a distinct NYT flavor.

For the uninformed reader, the article succeeds in finding a balanced
language between two equal sides. This misleading moral equivalence is one
of the biggest intellectual blind spots for western journalists. If they do not
outwardly champion Israel’s discourse on ‘security’ and ‘right to defend
itself’, they create false parallels between Palestinians and Israelis, as if a
military occupier and an occupied nation have comparable rights and
responsibilities.

Obviously, this logic does not apply to the Russia-Ukraine war. For NYT and
all mainstream western media, there is no question regarding who the good
guys and the bad guys are in that bloody fight.

‘Palestinian militants’ and ‘terrorists’ have always been the West’s bad guys.
Per the logic of their media coverage, Israel does not launch unprovoked
wars on Palestinians, and is not an unrepentant military occupier, or a racist
apartheid regime. This language can only be used by marginal ‘radical’ and
‘leftist’ media, never the mainstream.

The brief introduction of the NYT article spoke about the rising death toll, but
did not initially mention that the 20 killed Palestinians include children,
emphasizing, instead, that Israeli attacks have killed a ‘militant leader’.

When the six children killed by Israel are revealed in the second paragraph,
the article immediately, and without starting a new sentence, clarifies that
“Israel said some civilian deaths were the result of militants stashing
weapons in residential areas”, and that others were killed by “misfired’
Palestinian rockets.

On August 16, the Israeli military finally admitted that it was behind the
strikes that killed the 5 young Palestinian boys of Jabaliya. Whether the NYT
reported on that or not matters little. The damage has been done, and that
was Israel’s plan from the start.

The title of the BBC story of August 16, ‘Gaza’s children are used to the death
and bombing’, does not immediately name those responsible for the ‘death
and bombing’. Even Israeli military spokesmen, as we will discover later,
would agree to such a statement, though they will always lay the blame
squarely on the ‘Palestinian terrorists’.

When the story finally reveals that a little girl, Layan, was killed in an Israeli
strike, the language was carefully crafted to lessen the blame on her Israeli
murderers. The girl, we are told, was on her way to the beach with her family,
when their tuk-tuk “passed by a military camp run by the militant group
Palestinian Islamic Jihad”, which, “at the exact moment, (…) was targeted by
Israeli fire”. The author says nothing of how she reached the conclusion that
the family was not the target.

One can easily glean from the story that Israel’s intention was not to kill
Layan – and logically, none of the 17 other children murdered during the
three-day war on Gaza. Besides, Israel has, according to the BBC, tried to
save the little girl; alas, “a week of treatment in an Israeli hospital couldn’t
save her life”.

Though Israeli politicians have spoken blatantly about killing Palestinians
children – and, in the case of former Israeli Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked,
“the Palestinian mothers who give birth to ‘little snakes’” – the BBC report,
and other reports on the latest war, have failed to mention this. Instead, it
quoted Israeli Prime Minister Yair Lapid, who reportedly said that “the death
of innocent civilians, especially childr is heartbreaking.” Incidentally, Lapid
ordered the latest war on Gaza, which killed a total of 49 Palestinians.

Even a human-interest story about a murdered Palestinian child somehow
avoided the language that could fault Israel for the gruesome killing of a little
girl. Furthermore, the BBC also labored to present Israel in a positive light,
resorting to quote the occupation army’s statement that it was “devastated
by (Layan’s) death and that of any civilians.”

The NYT and BBC have been selected here not because they are the worst
examples of western media bias, but because they are often cited as ‘liberal’,
if not ‘progressive’, media. Their reporting, however, represents an ongoing
crisis in western journalism, especially relating to Palestine.

Books have been written about this subject, civil society organizations were
formed to hold western media accountable and numerous editorial board
meetings were organized to put some pressure on western editors, to no
avail.

Desperate by the unchanging pro-Israel narratives in western media, some
pro-Palestine human rights advocates often argue that there are greater
margins within Israel’s own mainstream media than in the US, for example.
This, too, is inaccurate.

The misnomer of the supposedly more balanced Israeli media is a direct
outcome of the failure to influence western media coverage on Palestine and
Israel. The erroneous notion is often buoyed by the fact that an Israeli
newspaper, like Haaretz, gives marginal spaces to critical voices, like those of
Israeli journalists Gideon Levy and Amira Hass.

Israeli propaganda, one of the most powerful and sophisticated in the world,
however, can hardly be balanced by occasional columns written by a few
dissenting journalists.

Additionally, Haaretz is often cited as an example of relatively fair journalism,
simply because the alternatives – Times of Israel, the Jerusalem Post and
other right-wing Israeli media – are exemplary in their callousness, biased
language and misconstruing of facts.

The pro-Israel prejudices in western media often spill over to Palestine’s
sympathetic media throughout the Middle East and the rest of the world,
especially those reporting on the news in English and French.

Since many newspapers and online platforms utilize western news agencies,
they, often inadvertently, adopt the same language used in western news
sources, thus depicting Palestinian resisters or fighters, as ‘militants’, the
Israeli occupation army as “Israeli Defense Forces” and the Israeli war on
Gaza as ‘flare ups’ of violence.

In its totality, this language misinterprets the Palestinian struggle for freedom
as random acts of violence within a protracted ‘conflict’ where innocent
civilians, like Layan, are ‘caught in the crossfire.’

The deadly Israeli wars on Gaza are made possible, not only by western
weapons and political support, but through an endless stream of media
misinformation and misrepresentation. Though Israel has killed thousands of
Palestinian civilians in recent years, western media remains as committed to
defending Israel as if nothing has changed."

– Ramzy Baroud is a journalist and the Editor of The Palestine Chronicle. He
is the author of six books. His latest book, co-edited with Ilan Pappé, is “Our
Vision for Liberation: Engaged Palestinian Leaders and Intellectuals Speak
out”. Dr. Baroud is a Non-resident Senior Research Fellow at the Center for
Islam and Global Affairs (CIGA). His website is www.ramzybaroud.net


Responses:
[53485]


53485


Date: March 25, 2024 at 04:26:35
From: akira, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Stalin’s censors were crude amateurs compared to the NYTimes’ ...

URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/24/world/middleeast/al-shifa-hospital-gaza-israel.html


“have died during”
Stalin’s censors were crude amateurs compared to the NYTimes’ genocide
grammar-contortionists

"Several patients have died as a result of the Israeli military assault, the
Gazan authorities say. Israel says the operation is targeting Hamas leaders."

According to this article, Israel didn't 'kill' a single civilian.


Responses:
None


[ International ] [ Main Menu ]

Generated by: TalkRec 1.17
    Last Updated: 30-Aug-2013 14:32:46, 80837 Bytes
    Author: Brian Steele